Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal
http://www.mtprehab.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.17784/mtprehabjournal.2017.15.521
Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal
Research Article

Comparative and correlational analysis of the performance from 2016 crossfit games high-level athletes

Barbieri, João Francisco; Correia, Renan Felipe; Castaño, Luz Albany Arcila; Brasil, Douglas Vinicius Carvalho; Ribeiro, Alex Natalino

Downloads: 1
Views: 1030

Abstract

Background: CrossFit is a functional training modality created by Greg Glassman in 1995 in the United States. Such modality is characterized by the execution of complex and high intensity movements with the purpose of preparing the participant for the unpredictable. It is observed the exponential increase in CrossFit practice across the world, with this increase there are a consolidation of this modality with as a very peculiar sport modality, since as tasks to be performed in the competitions are made public just before the events happen. Few studies have focused on the determinants of competitive success in CrossFit, both morphologically and performance. Objective: This present study dedicated to investigate, in the existing literature and in the results of the 2016 championship, variables that can be predicted the performance of these athletes. Methods: The performance of 40 2016 - CrossFit Games finalists of both genders were analyzed in the morphological variables (weight, height, body mass index), performance and specific tests (Benchmarks and 1 MR tests). Results: We found that among male athletes, it was not possible to identify variables that could predict a classification. However, among the women, we identified some variables that correlated with classification, such as the Benchmark Filth 50, Sprint performance of 400m and maximal loads in the Clean and Jerk and Snatch exercises. Conclusion: It was attributed to the correlations found among women the smaller participation in the Games, this allowed physical characteristics as force to influence in the final position.

Keywords

CrossFit, Competition, High Level Athletes

References

1. What is Crossfit? [Internet]. 2016 [cited 12/10/2016]. Available from: https://www.crossfit.com/what-is-crossfit.

2. Glassman G. What is crossfit. Retrieved from. 2002.

3. Smith MM, Sommer AJ, Starkoff BE, Devor ST. Crossfit-based high-intensity power training improves maximal aerobic fitness and body composition. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association. 2013;27(11):3159-72.

4. Glassman G. Benchmark Workouts. The CrossFit Journal Articles. 2003(13):1-5.

5. Paine J, Uptgraft J, Wylie R. CrossFit study. Command and General Staff College. 2010:1-34.

6. Partridge JA, Knapp BA, Massengale BD. An investigation of motivational variables in CrossFit facilities. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association. 2014;28(6):1714- 21.

7. Bains G, Lohman E, Berk L, Sabir O, Aljehani M, Aljulaymi I, et al. The effect of an 8 week CrossFit type exercise on acute c reactive protein modulation. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2015;47(5S):372.

8. Brown D, Feito Y, Price B, Bycura D, Waugh K, Black R, et al. Crossfit Experience Attenuates Heart Rate Variability. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2015;47(5S):797.

9. Goins JM. Physiological and performance effects of crossfit: The University of Alabama; 2014.

10. McKenzie MJ. Crossfit improves measures of muscular strength and power in active young females. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2015;47(5S):797.

11. Murawska-Cialowicz E, Wojna J, Zuwala-Jagiello J. Crossfit training changes brain-derived neurotrophic factor and irisin levels at rest, after wingate and progressive tests, and improves aerobic capacity and body composition of young physically active men and women. Journal of physiology and pharmacology: an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society. 2015;66(6):811-21.

12. Hak PT, Hodzovic E, Hickey B. The nature and prevalence of injury during CrossFit training. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association. 2013.

13. Lu A, Shen P, Lee P, Dahlin B, Waldau B, Nidecker AE, et al. CrossFitrelated cervical internal carotid artery dissection. Emergency radiology. 2015;22(4):449-52.

14. Weisenthal BM, Beck CA, Maloney MD, DeHaven KE, Giordano BD. Injury rate and patterns among CrossFit athletes. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014;2(4):2325967114531177.

15. Heinrich KM, Patel PM, O’Neal JL, Heinrich BS. High-intensity compared to moderate-intensity training for exercise initiation, enjoyment, adherence, and intentions: an intervention study. BMC public health. 2014;14:789.

16. History: Find the fittest on earth [Internet]. 2016 b [cited 15/10/2016]. Available from: http://games.crossfit.com/content/history.

17. Butcher SJ, Neyedly TJ, Horvey KJ, Benko CR. Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit((R)) benchmark performance? Open access journal of sports medicine. 2015;6:241-7.

18. Bellar D, Hatchett A, Judge LW, Breaux ME, Marcus L. The relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise. Biology of sport. 2015;32(4):315-20.

19. Statistics From The 2016 Open [Internet]. 2016 c [cited 15/10/2016]. Available from: http://games.crossfit.com/video/statistics-2016-open.

20. Gerhart HD. A comparison of crossfit training to traditional anaerobic resistance training in terms of selected fitness domains representative of overall athletic performance: Indiana University of Pennsylvania; 2013.

5aa028470e88259b4e77d859 mtprehab Articles
Links & Downloads

Man. Ther., Posturology Rehabil. J.

Share this page
Page Sections