Effect of mobilization time by maitland method in nonspecific low back pain and neck pain.
Aguiar, Luis Eugênio S. de; Oliveira, Mafra Ralete T.; Caldas, Rafael Rêgo; Correia, Mariana Cavalcanti; Rocha, Sérgio; Carneiro, Maíra Izzadora Souza; Tenório, Angélica da Silva; Guerino, Marcelo Renato; Monte-Silva, Kátia Karina; Araújo, Maria das Graças R. de
Abstract
Introduction: Maitland method is a technique of manipulation and joint mobilization to reduce pain, recovery of mobility and joint alignment. Objective: to analyze the effects of spinal manipulation in Maitland pains of cervical and lumbar spine, considering reducing the exposure time of each maneuver on pain, range of motion and muscle function. Method: Eleven randomly patients assigned to two groups: (i) Experimental Conventional (GEC;06): conventional technical indications, (ii) Experimental Modified (GEM;05): protocol with the same maneuvers, but reduced application time. All evaluated before (t0) and after (t1) the period of therapeutic sessions with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Flexibility Test Bank with Wells and Surface Electromyography (EMG) for muscle electrical activity of the cervical and lumbar regions. The data were statistically analyzed; p <0.05. Results: In GEM pain decreased significantly (p=0.047), muscle electrical activity in the cervical region showed a significant trend (p=0.068). Flexibility in GEC was improved, but not significantly. tended Root Mean Square in the cervical region of the GEM (p=0.068) to achieve significant value, but this trend was not observed in GEC. In the lumbar region there were no differences in both groups. Conclusion: Volunteers in both groups had positive results even though not statistically significant. The effects of reduced time and time recommended by Maitland (1 minute) the sessions were effective in decreasing symptoms, pain and restricted joint mobility, but we consider important to continue further studies in this knowledge and practice of physical therapy area.
Keywords
References
1. Helfenstein Junior M, Goldenfum MA, Siena C. Lombalgia ocupacional. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2010;56(5):583-9.
2. Caraviello EZ, Wasserstein S, Chamlian TR, Masiero D. Evaluation of pain level and function on low back pain patients treated with back school program. Acta Fisiátr. 2005;12(1):11-14.
3. Lin PH, Tsai YA, Chen WC, Huang SF. Prevalence, characteristics, and work-related risk factors of low back pain among hospital nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2012;25:41–50.
4. Torres GC, Garcia RR. Perfil do desempenho ocupacional de pacientes com algias vertebrais crônicas, atendidos em uma clínica-escola de fisioterapia. Ver. Bras. Ciênc. Saúd. 2009;19:38-44.
5. 5. Maher CG. Effective physical treatment for chronic low back pain. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2004;35(1):57-64.
6. Holderbaum GG, Candotti TC, Christianu SJ, Pressi SA. Relação da atividade profissional com desvios posturais e encurtamentos musculares adaptativos. Rev. Mov. 2002;8(1):21-29.
7. Haas M, Spegman A, Peterson D, et al. Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for chronic cervicogenic headache: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2010;10(2):117-28.
8. Adams MA. Biomechanics of back pain. Acupunt. Med. 2004;22(4):178-188.
9. Costa D, Palma A. O efeito do treinamento contra resistência da síndrome da dor lombar. Rev Port Cien Desp.2005;5(2):224-234.
10. Heydari A, Nargol AVF, Jones APC, Humphrey AR, Greenough CG. EMG analysis of lumbar paraspinal muscles as a predictor of the risk of low-back pain. European Spine Journal. 2010;19(7):1145-52.
11. Walker BF, French SD. Pain in the neck: many (marginally different) treatment choices. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(1):52-53.
12. Lefebvre R, Peterson D, Haas M. Evidence-based practice and chiropratic care. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2012;18(1):75-79.
13. Maitland GD, Hengeveld E, Banks K, English K. Manipulação vertebral – Maitland. 7th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2007. p. 552.
14. Corrigan B, Maitland GD. Transtornos musculoesqueléticos da coluna vertebral. 1a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria e Editora Revinter Ltda; 2005:246.
15. Geisser ME, Wiggert EA, Haig AJ, Colwell MO. A randomized, controlled trial of manual therapy and specific adjuvant exercise for chronic low back pain. Clin. J. Pain. 2005;21(6):463-70.
16. Bertolla F, Baroni B, Leal Júnior ECP, Oltramari JD. Efeito de um programa de treinamento utilizando o método Pilates ® na flexibilidade de atletas juvenis de futsal. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte. 2007;13(4):222-226.
17. Tanaka TH, Leisman G, Mori H, Nishijo K. The effect of massage on localized lumbar muscle fatigue. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2002;2:9-14.
18. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10:361-74.
19. Jesus-Moraleida FR, Ferreira PH, Pereira LSM, Vasconcelos CM, Ferreira ML. Ultrasonographic analysis of the neck flexor muscles in patients with chronic neck pain and changes after cervical spine mobilization. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2011;34(8):514-524.
20. Powers CM, Beneck GJ, KKulig K, Landel RF, Fredericson M. Effects of a single session of posterior-anterior spinal mobilization and press-up exercise on pain response and lumbar spine extension in people with nonspecific low back pain. Physical Therapy. 2014;88(4):485-493.
21. Aquino R, Caires P, Furtado F, Loureiro AV, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML. Applying joint mobilization at different cervical vertebral levels does not influence immediate pain reduction in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized. The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2009;17(2):95-100.
22. Ianuzzi A, Khalsa PS. Comparison of human lombar facet joint capsule strains during simulated high-velocity, lowamplitude spinal manipulation versus physiological motions. Spine J. 2005;5(3):277–290.
23. Couto I. Efeito agudo da manipulação em pacientes com dor lombar crônica: estudo piloto. Fisioterapia em Movimento, 2007;20(2):57-62.
24. Keller TS, Colocca CJ, Moore RJ. Incresed multiaxial lumbar motion reponses during multiple-impulse mechanical force manually assisted spinal manipulation. Chiropr Osteopat. 2006;14(6).
25. Zatarin V, Bortolazzo GL. Efeitos da manipulação na articulação sacro-ilíaca e transição lombossacral sobre a flexibilidade da cadeia muscular posterior. Ter Man. 2012;10(47):40-45.
26. Piran M, Aily SM, Araújo RO. Análise comparativa do tratamento da dor lombar crônica utilizando-se as técnicas de Maitland, Mulligan e Estabilização Segmentar. EFDeportes.com, Revista Digital. 2012;170(17).
27. Harvey MP, Descarreaux M. Short term modulation of trunk neuromuscular responses following spinal manipulation: a control group study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013;14:92.
28. Kawano MM, Souza RB, Oliveira BIR, Menacho MO, Cardoso APRG, Nakamura FY, Cardoso JR. Comparação da fadiga eletromiográfica dos músculos paraespinhais e da cinemática angular da coluna entre indivíduos com e sem dor lombar. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2008;14(3):209-214.
29. Elfiving B, Dedering A, Németh G. Lumbar muscle fatigue and recovery in patients with long-term low-back trouble – electromyography and health-related factors. Clin Biomech. 2003; 18: 619-30.
30. Heydari A, Nargol AVF, Jones APC, Humphrey AR, Greenough CG. Emg analysis of lumbar paraspinal muscles as a predictor of the risk of low-back pain. European Spine Journal. 2010;19(7):1145-52.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email